EDUTEAMS: una herramienta de inteligencia artificial para la formación de equipos diversos, complementarios y equitativos en el aprendizaje colaborativo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23824/ase.v0i44.1009Descargas
Resumen
El trabajo en equipo es una competencia clave en la educación del siglo XXI, pero su desarrollo en los centros educativos enfrenta retos persistentes: la colaboración no surge de manera automática y la formación de equipos basada en criterios aleatorios o intuitivos suele generar desigualdades y baja cohesión. Este artículo presenta una experiencia educativa y tecnológica centrada en EDUTEAMS, una plataforma gratuita desarrollada por el Instituto de Investigación en Inteligencia Artificial (IIIA-CSIC) que utiliza algoritmos de inteligencia artificial para formar equipos diversos, complementarios y equitativos en contextos educativos. Se describe su diseño, funcionamiento y validación inicial en un estudio descriptivo de innovación, basado en su aplicación en Formación Profesional (FP) y educación superior. Los resultados evidencian mejoras en cohesión, participación y rendimiento, además de reducir la carga organizativa del profesorado. En conjunto, EDUTEAMS representa una innovación pedagógica y tecnológica que promueve la equidad y la eficacia en el aprendizaje colaborativo.
Referencias
AIHUB CSIC. (2025, julio 1). Escuela AIHUB de Verano – Martes 1 de julio de 2025 [Vídeo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCOk8N6YdFY
Andrejczuk, E., Bistaffa, F., Blum, C., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., y Sierra, C. (2018a). Solving the synergistic team composition problem. In M. Dastani, G. Sukthankar, E. André, y S. Koenig (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2018) (pp. 2105–2107). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. https://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/191739
Andrejczuk, E., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., Sierra, C., Roig, C., y Parejo-Romero, Y. (2018b, October). Don’t leave anyone behind: Achieving team performance through diversity. In 2018 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
Andrejczuk, E., Bistaffa, F., Blum, C., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., y Sierra, C. (2019). Synergistic team composition: A computational approach to foster diversity in teams. Knowledge-Based Systems, 182, 104799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.06.007
Bach, A., y Thiel, F. (2024). Collaborative online learning in higher education—quality of digital interaction and associations with individual and group-related factors. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1356271. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1356271
Bai, B., Zang, X., y Guo, W. (2025). Hong Kong students’ motivational beliefs and emotions in collaborative learning in ESL classrooms: influences of actual and self-perceived English proficiency. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-10011-7
Bear, J. B., Weingart, L. R., y Todorova, G. (2014). Gender and the emotional experience of relationship conflict: The differential effectiveness of avoidant conflict management. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 7(4), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12039
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 92(3), 595. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595
Bell, S. T., Brown, S. G., Colaneri, A., y Outland, N. (2018). Team composition and the ABCs of teamwork. American psychologist, 73(4), 349. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000305
Beddoes, K., y Panther, G. (2018). Gender and teamwork: An analysis of professors’ perspectives and practices. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(3), 330-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1367759
Boeskens, L., y Nusche, D. (2021). Not enough hours in the day: Policies that shape teachers' use of time. OECD Education Working Papers, 245, 0_1-94. https://doi.org/10.1787/15990b42
Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2715 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218-4363.
Capdeferro, N. y Romero, M. (2012). Are Online Learners Frustrated with Collaborative Learning Experiences? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127
Carr, T., Cox, L., Eden, N., y Hanslo, M. (2004). From peripheral to full participation in a blended trade bargaining simulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00381.x
Channa, F., Dindar, M., Nguyen, A., y Mishra, R. (2024). Exploring sequential interplay between challenges and regulatory processes in collaborative learning with process mining. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(6), 1320-1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2229367
Chen, J. Q., Moran, S., y Gardner, H. (2009). Multiple intelligences around the world. John Wiley y Sons.
Comisión Europea, Dirección General de Educación, Juventud, Deporte y Cultura. (2019). Competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente [Key competences for lifelong learning]. Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540
Corrégé, J. B., y Michinov, N. (2021). Group size and peer learning: Peer discussions in different group size influence learning in a biology exercise performed on a tablet with stylus. Frontiers in Education, 6, p. 733663. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.733663
Costa, P. T., y McCrae, R. R. (1985). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR).
Dong, Y., Ma, H., Tang, J., y Wang, K. (2018). Collaboration diversity and scientific impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03694. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.03694
European Commission. (s. f.). ESCO: European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations. https://esco.ec.europa.eu/
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations.
Francis, N., Pritchard, C., Prytherch, Z., y Rutherford, S. (2025). Making teamwork work: enhancing teamwork and assessment in higher education. FEBS open bio, 15(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13936
Fu, L., Wang, J., Liu, M.J. (2022). Beyond a Curse or Blessing: The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Creativity and Innovation. In: Chan, H.K., Liu, M.J., Wang, J., Zhang, T. (eds) Responsible Innovation Management. Responsible Innovation in Industry. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4480-2_7
Feng, Q., Luo, H., Li, W., Chen, T., y Song, N. (2023). Effects of gender diversity on college students’ collaborative learning: From individual gender to gender pairing. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16237
Gabelica, C., De Maeyer, S., y Schippers, M. C. (2022). Taking a free ride: How team learning affects social loafing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 716. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000713
Gallus, J., y Bhatia, S. (2020). Gender, power and emotions in the collaborative production of knowledge: A large-scale analysis of Wikipedia editor conversations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.02.003
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic books.
Georgara, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., y Sierra, C. (2021). Towards a competence-based approach to allocate teams to tasks: Extended Abstract. En Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2021) IFAAMAS. https://www.iiia.csic.es/media/filer_public/56/bd/56bd5c0d-2df6-4627-b2e8-23fda46533d0/aamas_2021_extendedabstract_submission_385.pdf
Georgara, A., A. Rodríguez-Aguilar, J., y Sierra, C. (2022, September). Allocating teams to tasks: an anytime heuristic competence-based approach. In European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 152-170). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Georgara, A., Santolini, M., Kokshagina, O., Haux, C. J. J., Jacobs, D., Biwott, G., ... y Rodriguez-Aguilar, J. A. (2025). Optimising team dynamics: The role of AI in enhancing challenge-based learning participation experience and outcomes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8,100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100388
Gharaibeh, M., Alamarnih, E., y Gharaibeh, M. A. (2025). Improving Verbal and Leadership Skills in Gifted Sixth Graders: An Intervention Evaluation in the United Arab Emirates. The International Journal of Diversity in Education, 25(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0020/CGP/v25i02/23-47
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Hakami, L., Hernández‐Leo, D., Amarasinghe, I., y Sayis, B. (2024). Investigating teacher orchestration load in scripted CSCL: A multimodal data analysis perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 1926-1949. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13500
Imran, M., Halawa, T. F., Baig, M., Almanjoumi, A. M., Badri, M. M., y Alghamdi, W. A. (2022). Team-based learning versus interactive lecture in achieving learning outcomes and improving clinical reasoning skills: a randomized crossover study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 348. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03411-w
Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Sobocinski, M., Kirschner, P.A. (2021). Metacognition in Collaborative Learning. In: Cress, U., Rosé, C., Wise, A.F., Oshima, J. (eds) International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_15
John, O. P., y Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin y O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
Johnson, D. W., y Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., y Spada, H. (2015). Teacher competencies for the implementation of collaborative learning in the classroom: A framework and research review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 505-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9
Li, H. (2025). Impact of collaborative learning on student engagement in college English programs: Mediating effect of peer support and moderating role of group size. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1525192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1525192
Lin, Y. T., Wu, C. C., Chen, Z. H., y Ku, P. Y. (2020). How gender pairings affect collaborative problem solving in social-learning context. Educational Technology y Society, 23(4), 30-44.
López de Aberasturi, A., Sierra, C., y Sabater-Mir, J. (2025). Grounded predictions of teamwork as a one-shot game: A multiagent multi-armed bandits approach. Artificial Intelligence, 341, 104307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2025.104307
Mathuki, E., y Zhang, J. (2024). Cognitive diversity, creativity and team effectiveness: the mediations of inclusion and knowledge sharing. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(6), 1379-1403. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2022-0190
Mercer, N., y Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. (2019). OECD Learning Compass 2030: Concept note series. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Ortega-Arranz, A., Amarasinghe, I., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Corrales-Astorgano, M., y Hernández-Leo, D. (2024). Collaborative activities in hybrid learning environments: Exploring teacher orchestration load and students’ perceptions. Computers y Education, 219, 105105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105105
Österholm, E., Iiskala, T., Mustonen, R., y Murtonen, M. (2025). Metacognitive regulation: emergence, focus, and function in interprofessional collaborative learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10458-z
Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de la Unión Europea. (2016). Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 27 de abril de 2016, relativo a la protección de las personas físicas en lo que respecta al tratamiento de datos personales y a la libre circulación de estos datos y por el que se deroga la Directiva 95/46/CE (Reglamento general de protección de datos). Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, L 119, 1–88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
Pérez-Guillén, S., Carrasco-Uribarren, A., Yeung, E., Serra-Llobet, P., Pardos-Aguilella, P., y Cabanillas-Barea, S. (2025). Implementing Team-Based Learning in Physiotherapy Education: Students' Perceptions and Preferences Compared to the Traditional Lecture. Advances in medical education and practice, 16, 1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S519244
Possaghi, I., Vesin, B., Zhang, F., Sharma, K., Knudsen, C., Bjørkum, H., y Papavlasopoulou, S. (2025). Integrating multi-modal learning analytics dashboard in K-12 education: insights for enhancing orchestration and teacher decision-making. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00410-4
Pujolàs, P. (2008). Cooperar per aprendre i aprendre a cooperar: el treball en equips cooperatius com a recurs i com a contingut. Suports, 12(1), 21–32.
Pujolàs, P. (2014). Aprendizaje cooperativo para educar en la diversidad. In C. Echeita Sarrionandia y A. Ainscow (Eds.), Educación inclusiva: avances y desafíos (pp. 145–160). Editrice La Scuola. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/2414943
Sakka S. (2025). Team-based learning versus traditional lectures in local anesthesia course: A cross-sectional study exploring dental students' perception and performance. Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 19(3), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_582_24
Schneider, M. C., Holman, M. R., Diekman, A. B., y McAndrew, T. (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women's political ambition. Political Psychology, 37(4), 515-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12268
Sommet, N., y Elliot, A. J. (2017). Achievement goals, reasons for goal pursuit, and achievement goal complexes as predictors of beneficial outcomes: Is the influence of goals reducible to reasons? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(8), 1141–1162. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000199
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity (Vol. 1). New York: Academic press.
Strauß, S., Rummel, N. (2021). Promoting regulation of equal participation in online collaboration by combining a group awareness tool and adaptive prompts. But does it even matter?. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 16, 67–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09340-y
Sung, Y. T., Yang, J. M., y Lee, H. Y. (2017). The effects of mobile-computer-supported collaborative learning: Meta-analysis and critical synthesis. Review of educational research, 87(4), 768-805. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317704307
Tan, S. H., Liem, G. A. D., Ramos III, R. L., Elliot, A. J., Nie, Y., y Pang, J. S. (2022). Goal complexes: Integrating achievement goals as standards and self-attributed motives as reasons underlying goal pursuit. Social Psychology of Education, 25(4), 845-880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09699-2
Thuo, M., Jeffries‐EL, M., Holly Jr, J., Martin, A., y Blair, P. Q. (2025). Cognitive Diversity for Creativity and Inclusive Growth. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 64(4), e202415695. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202415695
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Vacheishvili, N. (2015). Cooperative Learning as a Democratic Awareness Method in Value Education. Education, Policy, Management and Quality, 7(2), 72-83.
Vedres, B., y Vásárhelyi, O. (2023). Inclusion unlocks the creative potential of gender diversity in teams. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 13757. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39922-9
Versteeg, M., van Blankenstein, F. M., Putter, H., y Steendijk, P. (2019). Peer instruction improves comprehension and transfer of physiological concepts: a randomized comparison with self-explanation. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(1), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9858-6
Vidal Fernández, R. (2022). Programació de noves activitats de la UF2 Inst. elèctriques interiors en edificis d'habitatges, per un CFGM per a millorar l'aprenentatge, organització i seguretat de l'estudiantat al taller elèctric (Master's thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya). http://hdl.handle.net/2117/370554
Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., y Vernon, P. A. (2006). Beyond g: Putting multiple intelligences theory to the test. Intelligence, 34(5), 487-502.
Waterhouse, L. (2006). Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review. Educational psychologist, 41(4), 207-225.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4104_1
Xu, E., Wang, W., y Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
Yang, C., Chen, R., Chen, X., y Lu, K. H. (2021). The efficiency of cooperative learning in physical education on the learning of action skills and learning motivation. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 717528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717528
Zhang, Z., y Gao, X. A. (2024). A longitudinal study of enjoyment and group-level emotion regulation in online collaborative English language learning. Learning and Motivation, 88, 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102052
Zhou, T., y Colomer, J. (2024). Cooperative learning promoting cultural diversity and individual accountability: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060567
Zuo, G., Doan, S., y Kaufman, J. H. (2023). How Do Teachers Spend Professional Learning Time, and Does It Connect to Classroom Practice? Findings from the 2022 American Instructional Resources Survey. American Educator Panels. Research Report. RR-A134-18. RAND Corporation.
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Publicado
Palabras clave:
Aprendizaje colaborativo, inteligencia artificial, tecnología educativa, innovación educativa, formación profesional, trabajo en equipo, competencias clave, EDUTEAMSLicencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Mireia Vendrell, Carles Sierra
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual CC BY-SA
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
a) Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a otros re-mezclar, modificar y desarrollar sobre tu obra incluso para propósitos comerciales, siempre que te atribuyan el crédito y licencien sus nuevas obras bajo idénticos términos.
b) Los autores/as conservarán los derechos de explotación de la propiedad intelectual del presente trabajo, y en especial los derechos de reproducción, distribución, transformación en cualquiera de sus modalidades y comunicación pública de dicha obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a otros re-mezclar, modificar y desarrollar sobre tu obra incluso para propósitos comerciales, siempre que te atribuyan el crédito y licencien sus nuevas obras bajo idénticos términos.
Acceda al Resumen de la Licencia
